that the Winklevoss twins are held in such low regard

(btw it says a lot about Hacker News, the kind of VC infested mind that dwells there)

I don't know the entire history and who knows if ConnectU would've succeeded or not (for various definitions of success)

But like, Zuck does all these shady things and somehow it's their fault? They meet Larry Summers (who's since been implicated in Epstein and apparently financial fraud) in suits and they get called "assholes"? Well, here's the lesson for life, everyone: fuck over whoever you want and you're sure to win
It is true Mohan kind of ruined the platform (but also Wojcicki before him; censoring "misinformation", most notable around covid but I'm unsure what else) and it's awful with unhelpful search results, Shorts, AI slop, comment auto-censorship (so you can ban comments and channels but you leave up the most egregious videos? yeah - sounds like every social site these days... maybe I blame Facebook that was able to IPO and become a certain visible presence in the investor community off fraudulent numbers, that also took down no abuse while banning regular people; everyone feels obliged to copy them) - but Youtube has been pretty bad for years before that, too. Banning videos that aren't "authoritative". And other things that make the user experience worse

I promise you, people making these decisions, if you apply for my company I will not ever hire you, and I will tell everyone I know to do the same

Hang your head in fucking shame. You should be disallowed access to computers forever. Placed under permanent house arrest

It's so offensive what you do (and makes a case, actually, for Google which owns Youtube potentially being involved with the 'deep' state)
Caring about money and shareholder returns is good

We'd all like to live in a world where money is no object but we don't live in that world

I get you have a Hard Job

However just bear in mind that when you alienate users and push them away after one too many braindead decisions you're ultimately going to _lose_ money and whatever goodwill in the process

(Of course, switching costs are high, that's the point, trap people)

Keep in mind also that a lot of your "earning value" seems like fraud in a lot of cases

Be careful you don't become yet another white collar person that ends up in a jail cell, because at least half of you are headed that way

Now, give us back the fucking products we grew up with and enjoyed, before you all ruined them

Thanks

VC slop

Jan. 10th, 2026 04:49 am
Hacker News needs to get its head out of its ass (hi, if this somehow ends up on there)

You are a fucking joke. You endlessly splitting hairs and your unnecessarily stringent moderation means topics really can only get discussed in a limited way. Anyone familiar with HN will know EXACTLY what I'm talking about

There's no need to redefine every word when you discuss things
Facebook is run by a sociopath regardless of political orientation

Google and Youtube censor everything

Elon freed the world from covid censorship but apparently the site still bans a whole lot of people and crashes constantly

You can't fucking use ANYTHING

Be better?

Not that that's easy when the VCs that fund the companies are like Marc Andreessen, whose worldview seems to be limited to "Edward Snowden is a traitor" (in fact he put it even better than that, "if you look in the dictionary under traitor there's a picture of Edward Snowden")

Fuck all of you, you all deserve prison time
How many people might get banned off an internet site for engaging in flame wars even when the people that person is posting about are incredibly stupid or similarly being inflammatory but in a less obvious ways?

We want to avoid "troublemakers", basically. If you punch someone, you might go to jail for it even if the person deserves that punch

We want everything to be "nice". Nice and sterilized (that describes Youtube and their modus operandi or Google's modus operandi for running it)

I'm not saying go ahead punch stupid people. (And besides, your own mental wellbeing exists too; ignore the idiots and those that hurt you) I'm not saying we don't need punishment broadly as a society, whether micro or macro

But y'know, sometimes things need to be said or pointed out in ways that don't completely conform to decorum

Google

Jan. 2nd, 2026 05:01 am
is not your friend

The technology needs to exist to be able to find stuff based on keywords and "Hey I'm looking for such and such but can't remember exactly how to find it" (LLMs might be helpful here)

But for the former Google completely stopped catering to that and more to the point they absolutely love censorship

They're such an offensive company
Are proof they don't understand their audience/community

(And hey, no option to 'never see this'. Only dismiss this one recommended video, which ostensibly means they won't actually take the hint to stop recommending mixes, only that one video)

Or that they're trying to copy TikTok or something

I hate what the internet has turned into. You all fucking suck. You make unusable websites. Fuck you

Dear reddit

Jan. 2nd, 2026 01:57 am
I don't want to be coddled, you fucking idiots

I don't want you removing covid "misinformation" subreddits like nonewnormal

Or you banning people from r/politics who don't operate according to your narratives

Or you quarantining subreddits

Management is totally fucking corrupt and criminal

But these days, of course, EVERY platform fucking sucks, for varying reasons, maybe I'll make another post about that

Oh - and New Reddit sucks. You intentionally broke old.reddit.com

All of you fucking fail upwards. You should be fired. You should be unemployed and unemployable

Youtube

Jan. 1st, 2026 11:25 pm
I cannot stress enough how much of a criminal cartel they are. The censorship they do is insane and it's perhaps telling Google owns them (I don't know how much Google censors but there's a reason people use DDG)

They've been pretty shit for years in a lot of categories but lately they've especially gotten really terrible

You should all go to fucking prison

pmarca

Jan. 1st, 2026 03:45 am
It's actually kind of terrifying how much power some VCs have or at least how involved in so many companies they are

When Andreessen calls Snowden "a traitor" it gives you the ammunition you need by which to judge his worldviews

Is all of Silicon Valley like that? No, but why are our companies made by people like that and not some of the EFF (https://www.eff.org/) folks?
And when I got there, Aaron Swartz was head of Reddit, not Steve Huffman

OSRS

Dec. 31st, 2025 10:57 pm
Hi it's been a while

It's sad that we have to do this (years of neglect, botched evolution of combat, storylines that make no sense in that the player can interact with characters they shouldn't know yet) but OSRS is a very legitimate game

I like how you earn your unlocks. Run energy kind of sucks, but it makes sense, the game is cohesive

Quests are hard requirements. To unlock Canifis you have to actually kill the temple guardian. And so on

And honestly the game is *hard*. Runescape always was. What RS3 does is to take an existing skeletal structure and bootstrap things onto it to make it trivial (like removing the challenge from Dungeoneering bosses etc)

Of course I understand the point of RS3 might be to get to the endgame. That's fine. (And I wouldn't even mind the gods coming back a la 6th age in RS3, as long as it's done cohesively) But OSRS just feels like they do things a little better

(OSRS is also not a game frozen in time. The game actively does get meaningful updates, new areas added)
Make a graph, and make it a function of time vs users with the added factor of a new product like the internet (I don't know how you'd graphically/mathematically display 3 variables like that, so maybe this is more of a sort of dimensional analysis thing, but... just go with it)

Early on, the internet doesn't have that much going for it on a social media level. Websites proliferated, but Myspace (well actually, Friendster is older, I think) was one of the earliest social media thing. And Friendster. 2003-6 is, still, very early

Myspace benefitted tremendously from onboarding people just as things were kicking off

It is true that Myspace had scale problems (Murdoch's fault?) as did Friendster. Facebook offered a real alternative

But Zuckerberg stole that from other people so it doesn't count

Early on Facebook would even delete your post if you posted about moving to a new social network

Shadow profiles, impossible to delete accounts. Their numbers are not honest, just like their CEO

And now people rail *against* antitrust action. I might too if they weren't so incredibly dishonest

"Dumb fucks" tells you all you need to know
Web 1.0 (so to say) encountered a bubble; I don't know much of that history but I do know at some point the bubble collapsed and people suffered because of it. This was around 1999?

It brings to mind the question of valuation, how much something is actually worth, given the relative market for it

My contention is not only is Facebook a parasitic bloodsucker but it ruins the rest of the internet

If they have fake acocunts (as Aaron Greenspan contends) they do nothing about, if they autoplay videos and count that as "views", if they do nothing to combat spam and fraud (Marketplace etc), and all sorts of other things I could mention, not only is it a shit product but it leads to people trying to copy their business model and falling on their face because it's all based on fraud

Collegehumor apparently shut down because of the video fraud

I am no fan of Google, but what if their behavior was shaped by the need to compete with Facebook? People liked Google+ a lot even despite the coercive tactics, and did they have to do that to compete with Facebook's act first, apologize later ethos (in which they constantly change the privacy settings)? Perhaps. What if their acquisition of Doubleclick for example was to compete in the market THEY imagined existing for advertising?

There's real value to something like Facebook but there isn't much point to using it (your shadow profile aside) because it's horribly broken and Zuckerberg steals everything from everyone else (Snapchat). I don't blame the Winklevosses for being angry. They apparently came up with .edu onboarding. Zuck presumably steals not just ideas, but concretely, code.

He is a terrible person who should be in jail for various abuses of some form of computer fraud and abuse acts

But what if the entire ecosystem is affected by it? Then you're not just "not using Facebook" and so not affected (again, aside from shadow profiles, or being tagged in photos after the privacy settings reset, or receiving messages they don't show you so you have to log in) - the entire rest of the internet decided to copy their "highly successful business model". What if it's literally all based on fraud?

Mine

Nov. 4th, 2025 11:27 pm
I want my comments on the internet, on this handle or another (I'm bad at names and tend to pick different ones so unfortunately/fortunately you can't identify me based on a causal internet chain, through forums etc), to be mine

They might be smart, they might be stupid. Maybe I should start a(n actual, not this) blog but then of course for better or worse I'll end up in someone's LLM, but whatever flaws there are I want it to be mine

Not as a bot, not as an influencer (soft i, I don't mean 'influencer', you know what I mean) looking to swing discussions left/right/up/down to a credible internet-forum-using-public

And unfortunately that's the problem with the internet because not only do these sites make very top-level executive decisions of what to ban (Reddit; r/nonewnormal, among others) but anyone can spin up an account and make comments and look organic because the very same websites that don't care also don't do enough (presumably; maybe they do take real concrete steps, don't know) to fight against it

Maybe the model should be like, somethingawful (on which I do have an account) where you get charged 10 bucks a pop (a pop = an account...). Good luck being a bad netizen on that

(Bad netizen can mean closed minded. You can be an organic bad netizen. But I guess I resonate more with bad netizenry, the people who are actually literally fake, making comments as part of a botnet or intentionally posting things they don't believe - you can do that to be contrarian, you can be a troll, you can be a dumb teenager doing this, but it's the "state actor" (or corporate actor) part of it that I really abhor. Eternal september?)
Or maybe this is just an anti-Reddit thing

See, the problem with reddit is you can't actually be yourself (obviously within the confines of not acting like a bigoted asshole) because politically motivated mods will ban you

Certain topics are completely off the table, like how the covid shots are responsible for millions of deaths (not allowed on Youtube either, by the way; methinks all these tech execs should spend a long time in a small cell) or how conservative-leaning folks might just be ok (or how "the vast consensus is that anthropogenic climate change is a real and serious thing" in spite of actual evidence by real scientists)

Reddit for being ostentibly decentralized is in fact very very centralized

All the platforms seem to be dying anyway, Youtube (see above) is useless and you can't compete with them regardless as that scale, Reddit - Facebook's Zuckerberg may be marginally better about some things but even he's just so incredibly unlikeable

Youtube

Nov. 2nd, 2025 01:07 pm
I am so fucking sick of you. It's become clear over a period of multiple years you don't care about content creators at all, what you're interested in is making it more and more "commercially viable"

It's why you got rid of dislikes - so people could be tricked into watching videos that advertisers put out

One of the many complaints I have with you, alongside your arbitrary censorship and your years long abusive copyright strike systems
No, not ACTUALLY tied of news

I get emails from Just The News and they do a decent job, if a little excessively American centric (you will get important stories like "50 dead in flood in Thailand" but you'll also get 5 stories of "judge blocks Trump initiative")

But in part it's a twofold thing, I'm tired of waiting for The Next Big Event (read: terrorism), waking up to news of "plane hits one world trade in new york" (I don't think it will happen again and it's silly to prepare for such a story but maybe as someone who grew up on 9/11 it's seared into my consciousness). I don't like "waiting" for the news, and I also don't, I think, always like being connected, plugged in

But the main reason I'm "tired of news" is because of The Algorithms

For those wishing to avoid Facebook and its broken-ass site and dubious mission objectives (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1692122) then Youtube is marginally better, with the home page being a mix of things you genuinely do want to see mixed in with things you've already seen and things it thinks you'll like

Of course, pure news things are always available, but I go on Youtube a lot, even by force of habit. And it's had terrible recommendations for years

Maybe in the pit of my soul I do prefer, as stated earlier, not always being connected. It's nice to get emails of news and leave it at that

Violence!

Sep. 17th, 2025 10:01 pm
Right now I'm playing final fantasy 6 (I'm on the Veldt hunting for some of Gau's rages - yes, it's boring). With Edgar I'm using Auto Crossbow to kill things, most of the characters have swords and knives

Does this make me likely to commit real world acts of violence? Am I tempted? Does this shape my monkey brain into monkey see monkey do? As much as anyone can know themselves - no

Well, that's not of course a "really violent game". What about Doom? The Columbine shooters played Doom. So have I. But I (and millions of others who played it) don't have an inclination to actually hurt people because of it

It's interesting how much we've collectively invested into reading into how much violent music and video games are responsible for things, while we ignore other signs
Page generated May. 22nd, 2026 02:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios